Wednesday 17 October 2012

Confederates as revolutionaries




By the League of the South

Andrew Hamilton at Counter-Currents Publishing has an interesting article which looks at the Southern Confederacy as a revolutionary movement. This is somewhat of an unusual perspective, as Hamilton notes. Because the Confederates were not Marxists they tend to be overlooked by academics and therefore are often not brought up when the subject of historical revolutionary movements are discussed.
Hamilton gives readers the basics of what Southern society rested upon, focusing on decentralisation/States’ rights, agrarianism, slavery, aristocracy/inequality, specific habits of mind and individualism. The last two might be the most interesting to SNN readers since they have been discussed here less often than the former concepts. The writer mentions ‘evangelical Protestantism, romanticism, chivalry, codes of honor, manners, reverence for womanhood, oratory, and dueling’ as being some of these ‘habits of mind.’ The individualist angle is not discussed in detail but Hamilton mentions that Southerners often found themselves in rural isolation and had to be self-reliant. They distrusted big government, as well. This led to what I have labeled ‘cultural libertarianism,’ especially in the lower and lower-middle classes (and this ‘cultural libertarianism’ should be understood as distinct from the ideological libertarianism of today).
Hamilton then goes on to discuss the informal group of Southern secessionist advocates called Fire-Easters, somehow leaving out the earliest and most consistent of them – Robert Barnwell Rhett. He notes how, through their tireless work over three decades, ‘Southern nationalists came to dominate the press, pulpit, and classroom.’
The final part of Hamilton’s article discusses how the ‘revolution’ was taken over by moderates just as it succeeded. The Southern ruling class was decidedly conservative, as was the agrarian South in general. Convincing its members to support secession was difficult enough.Secessionists then had to prevent conservatives from ‘reconstructing’ (the term that was then used) the Union by compromising with the Lincoln Administration and sacrificing Southern interests. After having prevailed in these efforts and convinced most Southerners to support independence, the Fire-Eaters were rewarded by being marginalised and having the government of the independent South controlled by moderates and conservatives, many of whom had been opposed to secession. In this way, the Confederacy was unlike many other revolutionary movements. The communists in Russia, Fascists in Italy, Nationalists in Spain and Marxists in Cuba all seized the reigns of power once their movement prevailed. Not so in the South. In this respect, the Confederacy could be seen as much less revolutionary than these other movements. Hamilton also notes the irony of the conservative rulers of the Confederate States mobilising their entire society for the total war with the United States which was immediately thrust upon it. The conservatives, then, completely revolutionised the South, including instituting a draft and engaging in rampant money-printing as well as other financial schemes in an effort to keep the South afloat.

Governor Burton & Southern sentiment in Delaware



By the league of the South

As we have discussed on SNN, the northernmost extremes of the shared agrarian civilisation of the Caribbean and the Souththat many nineteenth-century Southerners viewed in terms of a ‘Golden Circle‘ (a term we have revised for historical and contemporary Southern nationalist use) in some cases extended beyond the traditional or commonly understood North-South boundaries. One such area, as we have seen, was ‘Little Egypt‘ (southern Illinois); another was the small, coastal State of Delaware.
Delaware was considered a border State in the Antebellum period. It had been largely settled (especially in the southern part of the State) by colonists from Virginia and Maryland and it maintained strong cultural ties to the South. Though conditions were not ideal for a plantation society, slavery was legal in the State. However, by 1860 there were fewer than 2,000 slaves in all of Delaware with the largest slaveholder owning just 16 slaves. The Black South Carolinian slave owner William Ellison, by comparison, owned 63 slaves. Of the 20,000 Blacks in Delaware, 91.7% of them were free by 1860.
Despite the lack of a strong plantation system, Delaware was politically aligned with the South. Its citizens rejected the Northern Republican Abraham Lincoln at the polls in 1860, choosing the Southern Democrat John Breckenridge over Lincoln by a two to one margin. Like the other Mid-Atlantic States (especially Maryland), Delaware had a secessionist movement and though the State did not end up seceding in 1861 (had it done so it would have immediately been occupied by US troops, much like Maryland and parts of Kentucky and Missouri – in the end, Union troops were sent into the State anyhow to ‘maintain order’) some of its men crossed into Maryland and Virginia and joined the Confederate military.
One interesting document which testifies to the strong Southern support in Delaware comes to us from William Burton, the governor of Delaware. Burton was a Southern Democrat and Episcopalian from Sussex County, a States’ rights supporter and opponent of emancipation. Especially in the more populous lower two counties of Delaware, most of the people were sympathetic to the South. However, Delaware’s small size and precarious position presented Governor Burton with little room to maneuver. In an 1861 letter to Governor Thomas Hicks of Maryland, Burton discussed the strong Southern support in Delaware and stated his opposition to Federal troops occupying his State.

Wednesday 10 October 2012

Confederate graves in SC woods




September 7, 2012
By The League of the South

 
The follow pictures show two Confederate graves from the Holley family in western South Carolina.

Share



Tuesday 9 October 2012

Another way that the South is different: cheaper gas



October 8, 2012
By the League of the South

Notice that we Southerners have the cheapest gas in the United States. You can clearly see that the States of the old Confederacy stand out for their lower prices while in most cases the States just outside of the South have significantly higher gas prices. Meanwhile, the loonies in the California State and local governments have ensured that Californians have to pay through the nose for gas. But the Californians continue electing those people to office. I guess they enjoy paying super high prices for gas. Notice that once you cross the State border and leave California gas prices drop significantly.




Wade Hampton's Jeffersonian Principles




By Dr David Aiken

Nations and empires don’t last forever, not even as long as some families or churches.  They can be destroyed from without, or from within.
History frequently reminds us that there are two primary ways for societies, nations, empires, civilizations to die.
Nations and empires have repeatedly been ended by conquest from foreign forces.  History is full of examples of hostile destruction from without.  In the case of the American South, it was destroyed from without.  Our Confederacy was thwarted in its efforts to become independent and sovereign by the invasion of 1861 – 1865.  The Antebellum South and the Southern Confederacy – instituted and established to defend it – did not die a natural death.  Rather, the South was invaded, looted, burned and destroyed.  Savagely so.  Yes, the antebellum South could be said to have been murdered.
Mr. Lincoln’s War was not a civil war, but an invasion – an invasion to prevent Southern independence.  The key word – the first word – when talking about the war and Southern civilization is Invasion.
In the South Carolina Daily News, on December 25, 1866, William Gilmore Simms recalls the beginning of the Southern Confederacy.
The South, he informs us, exulted “in the birth of a new nation – a nation based upon justice and right principle, pure in its conception, sending abroad doctrines of peace and purity, eschewing strife, war, and all ideas of the aggrandizement of the one nation over any other.”  The Confederate South, he thus assures us, was not trying to become a new superpower.
The doctrine of the new Southern Confederacy would be “simply that each shall work out its own deliverance, in its own fashion; not making any vain pretence of such superior virtues as to assume a despotism of guidance or rule over other nations.”
But, Simms declares, the Lincoln administration invaded us, and we now “lament over the usual fate of all the Confederacies which have ever existed; all destroyed…”  We in the South have been coerced “into a voluntary Union – in a war which repudiated every American principle – which denied to the governed the right of making their own government, and butchered brothers, in order to make a more perfect brotherhood.  Our condition now happily illustrates the false pretences under which our country was invaded, our property destroyed, our people slain, our liberties usurped.”
The invasion of the South surpasses two other American enormities.  The Indian Wars began in New England in the 1630s, as Puritans began taking possession of Indian lands without even the pretense of just compensation.  This concerted effort mushroomed into America’s original and habitual national enormity – and became one of Simms’s most developed subjects.
Today it is fashionable to view slavery as the national enormity – a subject Simms also wrote on extensively.  Yet Africans were as a group better protected on this continent than were Native Americans.
Of all the enormities committed by Americans – including Slavery and the Indian Wars – the worst was the invasion of the South, which was a war that increased the national debt to $4.2 billion, destroyed some 20 billion dollars of private and public property, and resulted in the deaths of some 2 million people, most of whom were civilians both white and black.  The death of Lady Liberty, that wonderful gift of a free republic bequeathed to us by Thomas Jefferson and the founding generation, was perhaps the Invasion’s most shattering and irreversible act of destruction – even counting the countless atrocities and crimes perpetrated on Southern civilians, remembered and recorded in thousands of letters, diaries, and newspaper accounts.  As I have said elsewhere, “Despite the spinning of romantic historians, hard evidence indicates the invasion of the South is the American enormity.”
After the war, Hampton was not bitter. He said, “We acknowledge that the stern, irrevocable verdict of war has been rendered against us. ...We claim to be honest and loyal citizens.”

Still, Confederate Southerners would have to become citizens of two countries. Indeed, most Americans would now have to be dual Americans, because the victorious North would begin immediately to justify itself by claiming the invaders were righteous while Southern defenders were guilty and wicked. The Lincolnian American would spend a century and a half defending its unholy invasion of the South.
The most obvious example of imperial propaganda and deception was when Sherman blamed Wade Hampton for burning Columbia. The eyewitness accounts, though, easily prove Sherman the liar. In his Capture, Sack and Destruction of the City of Columbia, William Gilmore Simms records that Sherman dismissed his invading mercenaries with a general license to forage upon the people of the state: "It was the boast of every officer and soldier in [Sherman's] army, that he had fed fat upon the country through which he had passed; everywhere finding abundance, and had not once felt the necessity of lifting the cover from his own wagons, and feeding from his own accumulated stores. The mendacity of the man strangles his logic. But the complaint of Hampton, and of our people at large, is not what he fed his followers upon the country, but that he destroyed what he did not need for food, and tore the bread from the famishing mouths of a hundred thousand women and children - feeble infancy and decrepit age, and this, too, coupling with the robbery and incendiarism, deeds of the foulest violence, and most reckless debauchery, the meanest practices of thief and outlaw.” (89)

Simms summarizes the invaders, "These monsters of virtuous pretension, with their banner of streaks and spangles overhead, and sworn to the Constitution, which they neither understand nor read." Then Simms speaks of the encouragement they receive from their women back home: their appetite for thievery "is kept lively by their women – letters found upon their dead, or upon prisoners, almost invariably appealing to them to bring home the gauds and jewelry, eyen the dresses, of the Southern women, to deck the fond feminine expectants at home, whom we may suppose to be all the while at their devotions, assailing Heaven with prayers in behalf of their thrice blessed cause and country.”(91)

Years later in the twilight of his life, after repeatedly denouncing Sherman for his lies and war crimes, Hampton would say:

"I am aware that in certain quarters it is the fashion to tell our people that these are all dead issues, and that they should be forgotten as we press on in that new and glorious era which is dawning on the reconstructed South ... that we must forget and forgive! ... What are we to forget? Must we forget that we are the sons of men who gave their blood to establish the liberty of America. ... Can the father forget his son, struck down by his side, in the prime of manly strength and youthful beauty? ... Time may teach us to forgive, but it can never make us forget.”

Furthermore, Hampton claimed that all Southerners have the right

"to justify our cause, to vindicate our motives, and to honor our dead ... If our faith in the justice of our cause was so strong that we risked life and all that made life desirable on the dread issue of war, surely we should strive to justify ourselves in the eyes of the world."

Echoing William Gilmore Simms and many older Southerners, Hampton asked the women of the South to

"teach their children that their fathers fought for the right; that they were inspired by as just a cause as ever fired the hearts or nerved the arms of patriots, and that though that cause has gone down in disaster, in ruin, in blood, not one stain of dishonor rests upon it."

General Hampton continued in a speech before the Sons of Confederate Veterans in Charleston:

"It will be the task of your organization and kindred ones ... to preserve the honor and to preserve from detraction the memory of those who sacrificed everything. ...I want you to try to teach to your children and to your children's children that ours was not a lost cause. I want you to tell them that we were fighting for the right..."

Then General Hampton warned against the "false doctrine" of the new Lincolnian American,

"a false doctrine ... which tells you that because of the failure of our cause there was no truth or justice in it. Any human undertaking, however just it may be, may fail, but the everlasting principle of right and justice can never be blotted out. A great truth, like the God-head whence it emanates [from], is eternal, and it will live 'till the last syllable of recorded time.’”

What is that "great truth," “the everlasting principle of right and justice"? What did Wade Hampton consider those principles?

Who is a Jeffersonian American?

What are the core values which Thomas Jefferson and the Founders fought and died for when the British invaded?

What did Wade Hampton and South Carolina defend?

What motivated the South to secede and to fight until exhaustion in what we say in Charleston was Mr. Lincoln's War?
Green
Both Thomas Jefferson and Wade Hampton were what we call today green. Jefferson's Monticello in Albemarle County, Virginia, was the delight of his life. Built on land he inherited from his father, he died there in 1826 surrounded by his family of grandchildren and great grandchildren. His delight was always in the culture of the soil. He called himself the "most ardent farmer in the state."He conserved, planted, developed, rotated, selected and experimented, making Monticello self-sustaining for himself and some 140 other people. “The greatest service," he said, "that can be rendered to any country is to add a useful plant to its culture." So important was the land to Jefferson that he declared upon his return from France that he preferred the woods and fields to all the gay pleasures of Paris.

Wade Hampton was a major actor in the significant agricultural heritage of Carolina. Throughout the colonial period, South Carolina was not only the wealthiest colony in America but also the wealthiest in the entire, sprawling British Empire. Nine of the ten richest Americans during this period were from South Carolina. The contributions of South Carolinians to agriculture lead every state in America. From indigo, to Carolina Gold, to sea island cotton, to short-staple cotton the state has produced a long line of heroes of the soil.

Short-staple cotton was the source of much Hampton family wealth. The Hamptons owned one of the first cotton gins, and Wade Hampton III was a party to one of the largest financial transactions prior to 1861. In one day in 1860, Hampton sold three shipments of short-staple cotton, fetching him an unbelievable price of more than a million dollars each. (I always thought that deal made it possible for him to create Hampton's Legion.)

After the war, when the Yankees ran the country, the South's green gold was harvested. 146 million acres of timber in the South were cut. Over 160 million telephone poles today in our crumbling power grid came from Southern long leaf pines. Deforesting the South while industrializing the North kick started global warming. There is nothing green about Lincolnian Americans and Yankee dominance, unlike Jeffersonian Americans who respect, conserve and value the earth and all her treasures.
Inalienable Rights
Jefferson is remembered as the philosopher of the Revolution, the man who championed human rights – among them life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as well as the right of revolution. "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God," he said. "The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time."Inscribed under the dome to the Jefferson Memorial in Washington DC are his words, "I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

Wade Hampton was a champion of the rights of Southern Americans on dozens of battlefields. When Lincoln unlawfully and unconstitutionally called for 75,000 volunteers to invade the South, Wade Hampton responded by raising Hampton's Legion to defend the Southland. The key word here is self-defense. Hampton saw himself fighting a defensive war against unlawful, cruel, and mercenary invasion. Although he was not formally educated in military arts, Hampton rose to the rank of Lieutenant General to command Robert E. Lee's horse cavalry in the Army of Northern Virginia, surely one of the greatest armies the world has ever known.

Even though he defended life, liberty, home and family against aggressive invasion, Hampton fought lawfully and honorably, by the rules of international warfare, and not as Sherman and the Yankee invaders who by their example, (or I should say mis-example) re-introduced and glorified brutal total warfare, which became the accepted practice of Nazis and 20th century totalitarians. Yes, we can thank Lincoln and Sherman for 20th century total warfare. But Wade Hampton committed no atrocities and no crimes against women, children and old people.

He commanded with courage, intelligence, dedication and morality. And unlike his predecessor Jeb Stuart and many high ranking officers, Hampton wore modest clothes and behaved humbly and honorably, just as General Lee who always wore a captain's uniform.
Home Rule
Now we come to what some consider Wade Hampton's greatest contribution. Following Jefferson's principle of self-government by consent of the people, Hampton redeemed the state and ended Radical Reconstruction. The looting of South Carolina escalated after Sherman's march and after hard fighting ceased. Confederate Carolinians were disenfranchised; their property was confiscated; plantations were lost to banks and foreclosures; justice was scorned; and good people were driven beyond the point of endurance. Many were dejected and the overwhelming challenge for all was how to live after the war, how to go on in defeat.

Hampton became a leader and once again displayed his moral and philosophical superiority to the invading Yankees. He became a true statesman for South Carolina. By example and by public policy, he defended the decentralization of States Rights (as opposed to the new centralization and unitary policies of the Lincolnians); Hampton defended the sovereignty of the people in their home states (as opposed to Lincolnian tyranny of majority); and he defended self-government, the sound Jeffersonian principle of government by consent of the people, or as Hampton called it, home rule.

Ending the prodigal and criminal actions of the Reconstruction government, Hampton counseled against retaliatory violence and won the support of decent Americans in both North and South, thus ending the darkest period in Southern history.
Debt
Lincoln did not hesitate to borrow 4.3 billion dollars to wage his unjust war to prevent Southern independence, at 7% interest. There was no control on spending in Lincoln's administration.

Needless to say, the carpetbaggers and scalawags during Reconstruction that Wade Hampton opposed imitated Lincoln's prodigal ways. In a time when public servants spent public money irresponsibly and lavishly, Wade Hampton stood for fiscal responsibility. After all, it was Thomas Jefferson who declared that the worst thing elected officials could do was to spend more money than could be repaid in 20 years. Otherwise the greedy present generations will doom their children and grandchildren to perpetual debt and to economic slavery. Public indebtedness, Jefferson said, would be the destruction of all freedoms and civic virtue. Jefferson considered his greatest achievement as president to be the reduction of the Revolutionary War debt.

Today, there is no question which side our government is on. Our leaders are spending the youth of American into slavery. Every American baby and every American child owes a debt of $50,000 to reduce the imperial American deficit, even before accepting that first job or voting a single time. Neither Southern slave babies nor African children sold into slavery were ever so encumbered.

Would we be better off under Jeffersonian principles of fiscal management? Certainly our children and grandchildren would be.

Would we be closer to our ideals if Wade Hampton and the Confederates had prevailed? Yes.

Would the world be better off if the Confederates had won? Absolutely.
Conclusion
Why remember Wade Hampton?

Education in South Carolina today is called the heart of what's wrong with the state. Many say that education should produce the workers needed to "turn South Carolina around." Some of these activists are looking for ways to continue exploiting the state – after Invasion, after Radical Reconstruction, after deforestation, after 150 years of misrepresentation. Republicans have been obsessed with turning their view of the war into historical record. As a result the Jeffersonian view of America, the original view of the Founding Fathers as an experiment in justice and prosperity, has been removed from public record. To the detriment of us all, our education is currently teaching our youth to feel guilty and to be ashamed of the South, especially the antebellum South and the Confederate South – those periods in our history most Jeffersonian.

But once we open a discussion of the Invasion – its immediate and long-term consequences, then age-old biases and hard-line prejudices are suddenly revealed and softened. When we talk about Invasion and the patriotic heroes who defended their home states, then do we see the conflict between American centralization and imperialism, on one hand, and Jeffersonian decentralization and home rule on the other.

Who, then, is an American?

Wade Hampton is one of our best, because he reminds us of our fundamental principles – defending our homes, our families, and our liberties; while preserving our sacred places and conserving responsibly this marble green earth.

When asked what is an American, our answers are based on history and heroes. Those Jeffersonian principles our ancestors fought for – including self-defense, self-government, fiscal responsibility and a green management of our resources – are the basis of the real American experiment in government, largely because those principles produced such people as Wade Hampton. In war and in peace, Wade Hampton fought against wasteful and prodigal spending, against planet destroying destruction, and against imperialistic tyranny.
Surely we should follow his example.

Featured Presentation
Wade Hamption Memorial Service
Trinity Episcopal Cathedral
Columbia, South Carolina
10 April 2010

 

US conservatism vs Southern nationalism


US conservatism vs Southern nationalism

A point which is not made often enough is that Southern nationalists are not just US conservatives who believe in States’ rights and live in the South. Once this is understood, things start to fall in place. Those who professor Alexander Dugin calls ‘status quo conservatives’ are distinct from our tradition. We may agree with them on some things. We may win them over to our positions some times. But we are quite distinct. Note how Dugin perfectly describes US conservatism in his first English-language book, The Fourth Political Theory: ‘It is liberal because it says “yes” to the main trend that is realised in modernity. But at each stage of this trend it attempts to step on the brakes: “Let’s go slower, let’s not do that now, let’s postpone that.”‘

In an age like this, conservatism offers us nothing of substance because it lacks ideas and solutions to the problems we face. It merely defends the status quo of liberal hegemony or, at its most revolutionary, wishes to bring back a supposed golden age under Ronald Reagan (who gave amnesty to three million illegal immigrants and made MLK Day a Federal holiday) or George W Bush (who strongly supported Third World immigration and imposed anti-Southern legislation upon us).
As we continue to point out as Southern nationalists, the status quo is literally destroying us; it is replacing us and our culture.Survival requires something different than just conserving the status quo.
Southern nationalists ≠ US conservatives.


Sunday 7 October 2012

Charleston culture: French Huguenot influence & speech



 

September 11, 2012


 
Hardly anyone outside of South Carolina acknowledges the French Huguenot presence in Charleston. Many of the city’s most prominent families – the Ravenels, the Laurens and the Legarés – are of French Huguenot descent. Their culture is an integral part of the city today.
A famous contemporary example of a Charlestonian French Huguenot is Congressman Arthur Ravenel, Jr., who is the namesake of the Arthur Ravenel Jr Bridge and served South Carolina’s First Congressional district in the United States House of Representatives from 1987-1995.
An area in the Southeastern quarter of the peninsula with a significant French Huguenot presence (as well as the city’s French Huguenot church) is referred to as the French Quarter by many Charlestonians.
The French Quarter of downtown Charleston, SC
Many non-Charlestonians seem to forget that we’re a unique Tidewaterese city, rather than a general Southern city. To outsiders we’re seen as the general ‘classical’ Deep South. It’s confusing to many of us here who see ourselves as Southern, but shaped by our many influences that aren’t conventionally ‘South Carolinian.’ Our culture reflects the French Huguenot, British, Sephardic, West African, German, Muskogean, Iroquoian and Siouan ancestry of our city’s inhabitants.
While we exhibit many speech patterns similar to the rest of South Carolina (namely the cheer-chair merger), many in South Carolina can instantly identify us by our speech. Our speech sounds West Indian (even Celtic or Canadian at times) and is closely related to that of Tidewater Virginia, the Outer Banks, Tangier Island and Smith Island. Many older people and some younger people in the city also speak Sea Island Creole, an English creole unique to the coastal counties of Southern North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Northern Florida. Unfortunately, migration from the North and our city being advertised as a ‘desirable place to relocate’ by the government of Mayor Joseph P Riley, Jr has diluted much of the city’s culture.

Rhett & secession as a life’s policy



September 22, 2012

Most Southerners in the antebellum age were, as is still the case today, conservatives. Most were not eager to dissolve the Union and create an independent Southern confederation. The political elites, in particular, tended towards caution andresisted a growing movement of more radical Southern nationalists which grew out of the nullification battles of the late 1820s and early 1830s and continued to gain strength especially across the Lower South for the next three decades. Even after the secessionists prevailed (against the strong resistance of the conservatives) in 1860-61, conservatives (such as Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens) were given control of the fledgling Confederate States and it was they, not the radicals, who directed the South in its mortal struggle against the United States.
If there was a godfather of the Southern radicals, it was surely Robert Barnwell Rhett. No one fought as relentlessly and as long as Rhett for the dream of Southern independence. Historian and author William C Davis writes on page xi of his editor’s introduction to A Fire-Eater Remembers: The Confederate Memoir of Robert Barnwell Rhett, about Rhett’s unwavering commitment to Southern nationalism.
[Rhett] took a seat in Congress in 1837, there to serve for the next twelve years, and then in 1851, at the death of [John C] Calhoun, South Carolina elected him to fill the dead sage’s seat in the Senate. Rhett held the seat barely a year, however, before resigning after South Carolina again backed away from secession as a result of protest over the Compromise of 1850. By now Rhett stood irrevocably committed to secession, not just in response to particular actions by the federal government, but as a life’s policy. He had promoted it in the nullification crisis. He promoted it at the Nashville convention in 1850, and from the time of his resignation until the 1860 election of Abraham Lincoln finally impelled the rest of the Deep South to catch up to him, he never stopped arguing for permanent separation in order to protect slavery, the sovereignty of South Carolina, and to combat the insidious incursions of protective tariffs and internal improvements, means by which the more powerful North had all but enslaved the South.

Monday 1 October 2012

Confederate States of America / Etats Confédérés d'Amérique (1861-1865)

Anthem : Dixie's Land, popular song of the C.S.A Hymne : Dixie's Land, chanson populaire des E.C.A Flag : The Blood-Stained Banner, last banner of the C.S.A in 1865 Drapeau : La Blood-Stained Banner, dernier drapeau des E.C.A en 1865